This Blog
Linked From Here
The Web
This Blog
 
 
 

 

Linked From Here
 
 
 
The Web
 
 
 

你愛你的貓、你的狗嗎?如果有人告訴你,為了確保你的貓狗的飼料安全,必須犧牲其他貓狗的生命,你願意買這個飼料嗎?

不要懷疑,殘忍的動物實驗並不會因為美麗的包裝而消失不見愛慕思(Iams)與旗下的優卡(Eukanuba)是寵物食品的大廠牌,在他們的包裝上的狗貓都是健康、開心的。但是,你知道這是個天大的謊言嗎?


不相信?PETA告訴你醜陋的真相:

從2002到2003年,將近10個月的時間,PETA的調查員隱藏身分在Sinclair Research Center,受僱於Iams(愛慕思)的實驗室裡工作。PETA調查員發現在Iams寵物食品清新、健康的包裝下,隱藏的是黑暗且骯髒的秘密。在實驗室,被關在鐵籠裡成天對著水泥牆的狗狗瘋掉了、大腿肌肉被砍掉的狗狗成堆地被丟在骯髒、油漆斑駁的地上、狗狗被割掉了聲帶、生了重病的貓狗在毫無獸醫關照的情況下被扔在籠子裡繼續受苦。

影片顯示,Iams(愛慕思)的公司代表曾經來過這個實驗室,並且親眼目睹狗狗在酷暑中熱得發昏在籠子裡轉來轉去。Iams知道此事,但他們卻沒有保護這些動物。



美國農業部審核了PETA提出的抗議後表示該實驗室確實沒有提供獸醫照護、沒有提供受苦的動物麻醉或止痛、沒有提供足夠的空間、沒有做好員工教育訓練,該實驗室同時違反了其他40項聯邦動物福利法規範。Siniclair Research Center付出美金$33,000元(相當於一百零五萬六千元台幣)的罰款。
在PETA與支持者的強大壓力下,Iams同意針對其實驗方式做出以下幾項改變:

1. Iams順從壓力,切斷與Siniclair Research Center的關係
2. Iams停止所有具侵入性與末端的貓、狗實驗
3. Iams同意開始進行人道的「居家」食物味道實驗

根據Iams表示,實驗中大約70%的動物在家中與飼主同住。在這些實驗中,飼主自願讓寵物在家中居住,參與食品營養成份的實驗。透過訓練,飼主可以輕易 地餵食寵物,並採集寵物的糞便以供實驗室作為參考指標。「居家實驗」已經過奧克拉荷馬州立大學PetSci program證實是有效的。

即使如此,Iams仍舊在他們位於俄亥俄州的實驗室中保留700隻左右的貓狗,進行非侵入性的營養成分測試。他們宣稱該實驗室提供動物像樣的環境,但他們拒絕‭‬讓PETA的代表進入參觀。Iams宣稱有些實驗太過複雜,無法以居家實驗方式進行。PETA呼籲Iams與獸醫團隊合作來進行這些實驗,因為獸醫具備豐富的醫療經驗,知道哪些食品可以減輕寵物的病痛。

Iams‭沒有停止以其他(非狗貓)的動物進行侵入性的實驗。Iams贊助Purdue大學將近$200,000美金來進行一項長達兩年的實驗。實驗過程中,老鼠 的尾巴被黏在籠子頂端,而老鼠的後腿部懸掛在空中。這項實驗的目的是為了造成肌肉萎縮。當PETA提出抗議後,該實驗提前終止。

Iams同時也杯葛一公立大學欲發表的研究結果,該研究以人工方式在狗身上引導出痛苦的疾病,而該研究的出資者正是Iams。Iams究竟在隱藏什 麼呢?

雖然Iams已經有所改進,但是身為該產業的領導品牌,Iams應該傳遞更清楚的訊息,那就是:沒有動物應該面臨像那些在實驗室中的動物的悲慘命運。安全、健康的寵物食品不應該是由傷害其他貓狗得來的。

PETA仍在持續勸說Iams禁止進行或贊助任何形式、任何物種的動物實驗,並且使用100%人道、無侵入性、不關牢籠的「居家實驗」,就像Iams的有良心的競爭者所使用的那樣。
一直到Iams同意停止動物實驗之前,PETA強烈呼籲消費者購買無動物實驗的狗食。

以下圖片為PETA的工作人員在Iams實驗室所偷拍到的畫面

成堆的狗隻腿部肌肉被切除 丟在地上


腿部肌肉被切開近拍


被綑綁著的狗狗掙扎


骯髒不堪的環境、無獸醫照料受傷的狗


成日被關在鐵籠中渴望自由

此外,英國Uncaged同時呼籲消費者抵制雀巢的普瑞納(Purina)與寶路(Pedigree),因為這兩個廠牌在歐洲都是有做動物實驗。
抵制名單:普瑞納(Purina)、寶路(Pedigree)、皇家(Royal Canin)、愛寶(Alpo)、希爾斯(Hills Science Diet)、


Nestlé Purina/Friskies:
Alpo, Bonio, Felix, Go Cat, Gourmet,
Omega Complete, Proplan, Spillers, Vital Balance, Winalot.

Pedigree, Masterfoods (Mars Inc):
Bounce, Cesar, Chappie, Frolic, James Wellbeloved, Katkins,
Kitekat, Pal, Pedigree Chum, Royal Canin, Sheba,
Techni-cal (US & Canada), Whiskas.
Pedigree also manufacture Thomas rabbit food and Trill bird food.
  •  


資料來源:
PETA
http://www.iamscruelty.com/introduction.asp

Uncaged
http://www.uncaged.co.uk/petfood.htm

For nearly 10‭ ‬months in 2002‭ ‬and early 2003‭, ‬a PETA investigator worked undercover at Sinclair Research Center‭, ‬a laboratory hired by‭ ‬Iams‭, ‬and discovered a dark and sordid secret beneath the wholesome image of the dog‭- ‬and cat-food manufacturer‭. ‬Dogs had gone crazy because they were confined to barren steel cages and cement cells‭, ‬dogs were left piled on a filthy paint-chipped floor after chunks of muscle had been hacked from their thighs‭, ‬dogs were surgically debarked‭, ‬and horribly sick dogs and cats were neglected and left in cages to suffer without any‭ ‬veterinary care‭. ‬

Footage‭ ‬shows that Iams representatives toured the facility and witnessed dogs who were circling in their cells and sweltering in the summer heat‭. ‬Iams knew the truth yet did nothing to protect the animals‭.‬‭ ‬



The U.S‭. ‬Department of Agriculture investigated PETA's complaint and‭ ‬agreed‭ ‬that the laboratory had failed to provide‭ ‬veterinary care and pain relief to suffering animals‭, ‬failed to provide animals with adequate space‭, ‬and failed to train employees—along with nearly 40‭ ‬other violations of the federal‭ ‬Animal Welfare Act‭. ‬Sinclair Research Center paid a penalty of‭ $‬33,000‭ ‬for its violations‭. ‬


After intense pressure from PETA and its supporters‭, ‬Iams agreed to make the following significant changes in its testing program‭:‬‭ ‬
• Iams bowed to pressure and severed its ties with Sinclair Research Center‭. ‬
• Iams ended all invasive and terminal experiments on dogs and cats‭. ‬
• Iams agreed to begin conducting humane in-home tests for palatability studies‭. ‬


According to Iams‭, ‬about 70‭ ‬percent of the animals now in its tests reside at home with their families‭. ‬In these studies‭, ‬people‭ ‬volunteer their companion animals to participate in food and nutrition experiments from the comfort of their own homes‭. ‬The human guardians can easily be trained to feed the animals and properly collect fecal and urine samples for laboratory analysis to determine the quality of the animal's food‭. "‬In-home‭" ‬studies have been shown to work and have strong scientific support‭, ‬as shown by the successful‭ ‬PetSci‭ ‬program‭, ‬which was developed by Dr‭. ‬Charles Abramson and Dr‭. ‬Timothy‭ ‬Bowser of Oklahoma State University‭. ‬



Even so‭, ‬Iams still keeps up to 700‭ ‬dogs and cats in its Dayton‭, ‬Ohio‭, ‬laboratory for non-invasive nutritional studies‭. ‬They claim that this laboratory provides a decent environment for the animals‭, ‬but they refuse to allow a PETA representative to see inside‭. ‬Iams claims that some studies are too complex for in-home programs‭, ‬but PETA urges Iams to collaborate with veterinary clinics for studies such as these‭. ‬Veterinary clinics regularly see patients who suffer from ailments that a particular dog or cat food might help alleviate‭. ‬


Iams has also refused to end invasive experiments on species other than dogs and cats‭. ‬For one study‭, ‬Iams gave Purdue University nearly‭ $‬200,000‭ ‬to conduct a two-year study in which experimenters taped the tails of mice to the tops of cages to keep their hind legs suspended in the air‭. ‬This was done to cause muscular atrophy—the wasting away of muscle tissue‭. ‬When PETA protested‭, ‬the experiment was cut short‭. ‬

I

Iams has also fought the release of information from a public university that had conducted a study funded by the company in which a painful disease was induced in dogs‭. ‬What was Iams hiding‭? ‬



Iams has made progress‭, ‬but as an industry leader‭, ‬it must send an even clearer message‭: ‬No animal deserves the fate of those who remain in their laboratories‭. ‬Safe‭, ‬healthy cat and dog food does not require harming cats and dogs‭. ‬



PETA continues to press Iams to ban conducting and‭ ‬funding invasive or terminal experiments on all species and to adopt 100‭ ‬percent humane‭, ‬non-invasive‭, ‬and cage-free‭ "‬in-home‭" ‬testing‭, ‬as many of Iams‭' ‬compassionate competitors‭ ‬have done‭. ‬



Until‭ ‬Iams agrees‭, ‬we urge consumers to purchase dog and cat food from‭ ‬companies that do not test on animals‭. ‬In the meantime‭, ‬read about some other‭ ‬ways you can help‭ ‬the millions of animals every year who are abused and inadequately cared for‭, ‬all in the name of research‭.‬

Reference: PETA
http://www.iamscruelty.com/introduction.asp
Posted by Bug at 6:20 PM  

22 comments:

Wahrheit said...

看到這個訊息,本身雖沒有養寵物,但一定會將這些產品告訴身邊有養寵物的朋友,一定要遏止漠視動物權利的行為...

相信版主也是一位充滿善心的人,我猜想在撰寫每一篇文章時,您想必相當氣憤吧!不過也因為有像您這樣的人,我們才能得知背後的真相。

這裡很棒,期望您能繼續下去:)

May 8, 2010 2:11 PM
Bug said...

您好

感謝您的支持 其實我在撰寫文章的時候是盡量讓自己保持心平氣和(雖然有時候還是難免會激動) 畢竟一個憤怒的人是很容易把別人嚇跑的!要讓更多的人知道這種事情 就是要先控制好自己的情緒呀:)

因為我們每天都在購買各種不同的東西 在選擇商品的時候 其實也就是在選擇一種理念
所以我希望能夠讓更多人知道 想要改變世界不需要是超人才做的到的 我們只要從自己的行為開始做 就能夠朝理想的世界更邁進一小步

希望您能夠持續來光臨這裡 我會努力為大家推薦更多cruelty-free的商品的!

May 8, 2010 3:18 PM
Anonymous said...

您好~

我可否把這篇文章貼在"台灣動物緊急救援小組的討論區"上

我會註明出處..來源!!

http://www.savedogs.org/forum/article_list.html?cat_no=5

May 8, 2010 11:58 PM
Anonymous said...

看完後感到很痛心,商家為了自己利益, 漠視貓狗受到痛苦.

May 9, 2010 2:27 AM
Bug said...

Hi!謝謝您的支持 歡迎「全文」轉貼:)
我之前有貼在緊急救援小組的facebook上面 希望能夠有更多的人注意到這件事情

歡迎您訂閱我的blog 我會經常更新更多cruelty-free的商品資訊

May 10, 2010 10:21 AM
Anonymous said...

您好~~
愛慕思的圖片和影片
能否借我引用在我的blog中
http://blog.udn.com/eillenwang/3970861
謝謝~

May 11, 2010 11:14 AM
tetchan said...

How come no law to restrict these people....really heart broken to see that....

May 11, 2010 11:37 PM
Bug said...

Eillen,
可以轉貼!謝謝你的支持:)

Tetchan,
This research center actually had to pay $33,000 USD for violations of animal welfare. I think the current laws are not very friendly to animals, and that's why we as consumers have to be really informed when we buy stuff!
Thanks for your support and please come visit my blog in the future as I will be updating on more "cruelty-free" stuff :)

May 12, 2010 12:19 AM
Anonymous said...

hi~我已經貼到"動物緊急救援小組的討論區"了

http://www.savedogs.org/forum/article_view.html?f_no=19645

(請看~~目前點閱人數破千..希望更多人知道真相)

May 12, 2010 9:25 PM
Bug said...

感謝您幫我轉貼!看到點閱人數破千真的很高興 我也會繼續努力寫下去的!

不知道有沒有人是米格魯大學的會員可以幫我轉貼這篇?因為加入的程序好像有點麻煩

我希望能夠讓更多人了解動物實驗的可怕!!

May 13, 2010 11:45 AM
歸宿 said...

您好^^真的非常感謝您來看我們的部落格!看到您的留言,我們真的、真的非常感動~!!

您這邊的資料好詳細!!請問您此篇文章及文章內的影片、照片,可以借我們引用、轉貼嗎???
我們的部落格的網址:http://blog.yam.com/nigatsu

讓我們一起為這些動物們努力吧^^!!

P.S.我媽媽也是一直跟我說,我會不會被寶僑那些大公司盯上、報復之類的....XDD

May 13, 2010 9:51 PM
Anonymous said...

雖然每每看到這些相片 都會讓我心情極度低落 淚留不止.我們可以做的,就是努力的轉po.謝謝你的文章

May 14, 2010 11:30 AM
Bug said...

歸宿您好

謝謝你來看我的blog,歡迎你全文轉貼(為避免斷章取義)!
我目前正在整理一份在台灣可以買的到的100% Cruelty-free商品 不久就可以放上來摟!

給Anonymous
我看的時候也很難過 但是會告訴自己要為動物做一點事情光是難過是不行的 你也要加油喔
:)

May 17, 2010 2:18 PM
WHAT IF said...

你好~請問您此篇文章、影片、照片,可以借我轉貼到一些狗狗的論壇嗎

May 19, 2010 11:44 AM
Anonymous said...

之前在寵物店工作,忘了是經由誰提起(客人還是醫生)說愛慕思的飼料問題,主要是說他有含太多榖類還是玉米之類的東西對貓狗不好(希爾斯也是)沒想到在這看到更驚人的事實.....我家的貓咪從小就吃愛慕思吃了三年多直到我去寵物店上班(幸好得到很多知識就換了別家)

這消息我也會轉貼的!!感謝你的分享XD

May 24, 2010 1:17 AM
貞子咩咩 said...

您好...多謝你的張貼讓我看到了這殘忍的真相..
請問我可以轉貼在我的FB和其他部落格嗎?
感謝您~

May 24, 2010 1:49 AM
Bug said...

各位有留言的朋友大家好

如果要轉貼歡迎「全文轉貼」以避免斷章取義 如果您願意的話也可以留下轉貼的網址讓我去看看喔(我很希望能夠讓更多人知道這件事情)


給之前在寵物店工作的朋友:
其實飼料跟罐頭都是用很差的原料去製成的 在這方面我也有做過一些研究 不敢餵我的狗吃外面賣的飼料/罐頭
所以我自己家的狗狗都是餵生/鮮食 我覺得那是對狗狗最好的飲食方式了!
也謝謝你的支持喔 :)

May 24, 2010 12:58 PM
Venus said...

請問可以借我轉貼到FB以及部落格嗎?
我想讓大家知道寵物食品背後那醜陋的真相!!!

謝謝~

May 24, 2010 9:26 PM
Chao Zi Xian said...

真的很誇張!!請問我可以轉貼這篇文章嗎?
我會註明出處! 也會貼連結貼

May 27, 2010 7:40 AM
Bug said...

請「全文轉貼」喔謝謝大家:)

May 27, 2010 2:17 PM
惠珍 said...

請問一下這些實驗跟飼料製作有什麼關聯呢?

May 27, 2010 4:30 PM
Bug said...

惠珍您好

這篇文章講的是飼料公司如何使用狗狗做動物實驗 以殘忍的方式來測試飼料的配方
這也是飼料製造生產中的一個環節 我們希望這個殘忍的實驗方式可以被完全廢止 所以如果家中有寵物的話 在購買食品的時候也要多注意喔!

謝謝你對這個議題的關心:)

May 29, 2010 11:14 AM
arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    eAnniv 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()